|PGY1034: Features: -Clean look with minimal hardware visible from underside of work surface. -Increase efficiency by using multiple applications simultaneously, eliminating toggling back and forth between documents and programs. -Simultaneously lift LCD screens to suitable heights for supreme ergonomic comfort. -Unique 180 swiveling feature allows users to share screen with their close neighbour or the one across the desk ,making this perfect for selling and training environments. Product Type: -Desk mount. Color: -Silver. Number of Items Included: -1. Swivel: -Yes. Tilt: -Yes. Full Motion: -Yes. Screen Size: -24 Inches. Multi-Monitor: -Yes. Number of Screens: -2. Orientation: -Horizontal. Orientation: -Vertical. Articulating Arm Included: -Yes. Ergonomic: -Yes. Weight Capacity: -22 Pounds. Generic Dimensions: -Supports up to 2 x 24" LCD monitors. Specifications: VESA Compliant: -Yes. Dimensions: Overall Height - Top to Bottom: -14.8 Inches. Overall Width - Side to Side: -42 Inches. Overall Depth - Front to Back: -5 Inches. Adjustable Height: -Yes. Overall Product Weight: -12 Pounds.|
Customer Reviews of Cotytech Dual Monitor Desk Mount - Dual Swing Arm
Substandard and Impractical2/8/2012
I have two 17" monitors at my office that I mounted on this unit. Despite the measurements listed in the specs, the mount required at least 4.5" overhang to clasp onto. There's not too many desks which meet these requirements. When this didn’t work at my office, I tried mounting my 17” monitors at home. Luckily I was able to install the mount, but I found that the monitors sag 1 inch for every 6 inches the arms extend. Moreover, the monitors must be equally balanced from the base to sit straight. Even when the arms are tucked in close to the base, it takes up a ton of room since the arms protrude behind the base when tucked in. I’ve used much cheaper mounts in the past which are far superior to this one. The design would be great if it worked, but unfortunately it doesn’t. Don’t be misled by the sleekness of this mount, because it’s by no means practical and it won’t work as you hoped it would.